1-866-277-9958

My Twitter Direct Message Diatribe

valueguardian.jpg

Way back in the day of Twitter (circa 2008, that is) a direct message was a good way to start a conversation and connect with a new follower. At the time, I thought they were an invaluable tool for driving traffic to a website and starting a flow of communication.

Then it all changed.

Twitter reached a level of mainstream popularity usually reserved for pop stars like Britney Spears (450,824 followers) and Ryan Seacrest (164,721 followers). These days, Twitter is no longer a mid-sized social community comprised of people with similar interests. Now it’s an exploding social movement full of spammers, bandwagoners, opportunists and other forms of social sleaze.

The new Twitter users quickly realized auto direct messages could be used to drive quick and easy website traffic. Everyone (and their mother, brother, sister, aunt and uncle twice removed) started using them. And it’s always the same message. It’s like the Twitter universe formed a committee and had a secret meeting where they all agreed on a standardized format for direct messages. Salutation and thanks. Insert short pitch followed by website link.

So it’d look something like this:
(sorry Retireat21, but it’s time to kill your auto direct message program)

retireat21.jpg

If you’re even a moderate Twitter user, you’ve no doubt seen this lousy excuse for social media interaction. I’d say that 90% of the direct messages I receive are chock full of this junk. The Twitter direct message has become the equivalent of a pop-up banner ad or spam e-mail.

So this is my call to end the use of auto-generated direct messages. Really, any direct message link spam for that matter. If I see that you’re a valuable Twitter contributor, I’ll click on a link you provide in your Twitter stream. I will not, however, under any circumstance click a link you send me through an auto generated direct message.

For those of you employing this tactic, just stop. Take it from someone who used to partake - it’s not worth it, and it’s a surefire way to upset and anger the very people you should be interacting with. No one likes to be bombarded with irrelevant messages or advertising. You’ll be ignored, hated, and will miss out on the most valuable product of social media use - social interaction.

Will you join me in my quest?


Get Drupal help when you need it most! Find hundreds of great tutorials. Track, rate, comment and more. Create Account

Let's face it. Online, people

Let's face it. Online, people want instant gratification. As an Internet user, you want your browsing experience to be as painless and smooth as possible. PhD sociology AND hr diploma AND marketing diploma

If you make the process of

If you make the process of contributing content in any capacity an arduous one, it's likely your visitors just won't participate. finance diploma AND Nursing Diploma

I gave up on twitter, even

I gave up on twitter, even though its still growing. I did this because I relized the "followers" were not really following anything. They were all just opportunists. So now I just use it for private. There is this huge misconception that everything online is somehow fair game to commercial exploitation by anyone with a keyboard. And I guess that makes me a hypocrite. It's really hard leveraging a medium in an ethical way that promotes relationships... and I just don't see twitter as a good open public platform to make that happen. Plus I really don't care what Aston Kutcher had for breakfast.

Agreed

Twitter auto-replies are impersonal and forced - going against the whole point of Twitter, if you ask me. Auto-replies only make sense for emails (and ONLY if it's useful, e.g., links you to product documentation after signing up for a trial).

Syndicate content

©1999 - 2012 LevelTen Interactive - Dallas, TX